Angie and I have been married for almost three years. We’ve had one daughter, have another one on the way, and it’s been an overall good experience. Sure, I traded in my Swingin’ Bachelor Card, but I come home to a beautiful family, and I think that balances it out. Spending an hour in a Catholic church in Marshall, Texas totally turned out to be the right thing to do.
Too bad our marriage is null and void, according to Texas. The Great Republic of Funny Hats decided that, in order to ban that evil scourge to American ideals that is gay marriage, they were best off deciding that all marriages should likewise be outlawed.
Okay, okay, it’s not quite like that. But Texas is one of the most recent in a long line of states that decided that, hey, we’re progressive as the next state, but there’s something just weird about two people of the same sex wanting to spend the rest of their lives together. Texas did the natural thing (as natural as a legal system set up such that a select handful of rich and powerful people to represent everybody can be) and amended its stated constitution to make gay marriage illegal.
That’s what they intended to do, at any rate. Here’s the wording of the amendment:
Sec. 32. MARRIAGE.
(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Barbara Ann Radnofsky, Democratic candidate for Texas Attorney General, thinks that the wording of this amendment, especially subsection (b), invalidates all marriages that took place in Texas since 2005. But Walter, you’re demanding, state Congresses see hundreds of bills on any given day. They can’t be expected to read all of them! And I agree, especially when you consider that the average state Congress spends three weeks out of the year actually voting on bills. But this was a big one, at least big enough for politicians to put on their fanciest cowboy boots and parade in front of news crews for. I would have expected an aide to at least give a few bullet points to their Congressperson before a vote was cast. “Excuse me Mr. Tutwiler, I know it’s in the middle of your five-martini lunch, but this new gay marriage bill doesn’t read quite right.” “Don’t bother me now, boy, can’t you see I’m boozin’ with some high-class floozies?” “Yes, sir, I’ll be outside, smoking with the valets.”
So it looks like Angie and I may not be, at least in the technical, state-recognized sense of the term, married. Sure, we got a license, spent an hour in uncomfortable clothes in front of a priest, and drained her father’s bank account for the whole thing, but too bad! Texas says we’re not married! I guess this means Ema was, and Abby will be, born out of wedlock! Better call the Church, I bet Ema’s baptism won’t stick now!
I really don’t want to go back to being a bachelor. Do you know how long it took me to convince Angie to marry me? I finally got used to her snoring, and now I’ve got to do it all again? And is it really worth it? What’s to keep another state from invalidating that marriage? No thank you, I think I’ll become a monk.
That’s not illegal in Texas, is it?
{ 2 comments }











Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe via Email